Combination syndrome


Combination syndrome




Combination syndrome (CS) is a dental condition that is commonly seen in patients with a completely edentulous maxilla and partially edentulous mandible with preserved anterior teeth. This syndrome consists of severe anterior maxillary resorption combined with hypertrophic and atrophic changes in different quadrants of maxilla and mandible. This makes it a challenging condition in dentistry that requires significant experience along with advanced restorative and surgical skills .
combination syndrome also is “The characteristic features that occur when an edentulous maxilla is opposed by natural mandibular anterior teeth, including loss of bone from the anterior portion of 
the maxillary ridge, overgrowth of the tuberosities, papillary 
hyperplasia of the hard palatal mucosa, extrusion of mandibular 
anterior teeth, and loss of alveolar bone and ridge height beneath 
the mandibular removable partial denture bases,” also called 
anterior hyperfunction syndrome. Kelly was the first person to 
apply the term combination syndrome.
Additional changes occurring in clinical situations with 
the completely edentulous maxilla and partially edentulous 
mandible with only anterior teeth remaining include loss of 
occlusal vertical dimension, occlusal plane discrepancy, anterior 
spatial repositioning of the mandible, and poor adaptation of the 
prosthesis, epulis fi ssuratum and periodontal changes.
Combination syndrome occurs among 25% of individuals 
who wear both complete denture opposing mandibular anterior 
teeth and a bilateral distal extension removable partial denture

Sequelae of Combination Syndrome


Early loss of bone from the posterior part of the mandible 
leads to increase in function in the anterior region as a result of 
posterior hypofunction. Hypertrophy of the anterior mandible 
with anterior hyperfunction develops. Forces originating from 
the lower anterior teeth are directed toward the anterior portion 
of the unsupported maxillary denture leading to loss of bone 
and ridge height anteriorly, the posterior residual ridge becomes 
larger with the development of enlarged tuberosity.
However, enlarged tuberosities are also seen in situations 
where mandibular molars have been lost, the opposing 
maxillary molars may supraerupt together with the alveolar 
process.
Enlarged tuberosities along with an increase in bone 
height causes the occlusal plane to migrate up in the maxillary 
anterior region and down in the maxillary posterior region, 
eventually the natural anterior mandibular teeth migrate upward
with simultaneous mandibular alveolar hypertrophy. Anterior 
teeth on the complete denture disappear under patients lip 
eff ecting the aesthetic, showing none of the maxillary anterior 
teeth and too much of the lower natural anterior teeth.
With the lack of posterior palatal seal, a negative pressure 
develops leading to papillary hyperplasia.Along with 
negative pressure, chronic occlusal trauma from incisal edges of 
mandibular anterior teeth causes fl abby tissues in the anterior 
palate termed as papillary hyperplasia. Contradictory fi ndings 
have been reported by Kelly and Uçtasli et al.,. while the 
former has demonstrated resorption in the edentulous maxilla 
with no resorption in the distal edentulous area of the mandible, 
its vice versa is true in case of the latter, especially in distal 
extensions retained by anterior bar.
Another paramount aspect of the combination syndrome as 
a repercussion of ridge resorption is impairment in established 
posterior occlusal contact leading to the progressive collapse 
of vertical dimension of occlusion causing the mandible to move 
forward resulting in pseudomandibular prognathism. The Bone 
resorption beneath the mandibular distal extension, wearing 
of artifi cial teeth, positional changes in anterior teeth instigate 
parafunctional activities, thereby augmenting the force per unit 
area on the maxillary alveolar bone


Management of Combination Syndrome
Ill-fi tting dentures have been blamed for all of the lesions of 
edentulous tissues, but the most perfect denture will be ill fi tting 
after bone is lost from the anterior part of the ridge. Removable 
dentures need periodic attention to check for any tissue changes. 
Frequent relining of ill-fi tting dentures slows down but does not 
stop the development of combination syndrome.
Preventing the degenerative changes that complete maxillary 
denture opposing Kennedy’s Class I partial dentures can be best 
accomplished by avoiding extraction of lower anterior teeth 
and retaining weak posterior teeth as abutments by means of 
endodontic and periodontic technique.Also over denture can 
be considered as a treatment option of retaining the roots of 
anterior mandibular teeth to support an overdenture.
According to Langer et al.
both well designed removable 
partial dentures and over denture can be suggested for patients 
with an edentulous maxilla and some remaining anterior 
mandibular teeth. Well-designed mandibular removable partial 
denture is suggested for low-risk patients who have not developed
combination syndrome and whose mandibular anterior teeth 
are well preserved and have not supraerupted. However, the 
restoration of the posterior occlusion with removable partial 
denture will not entirely delay a progressing combination 
syndrome. The removable partial denture is advocated for 
situations that may eventually develop combination syndrome, 
but nevertheless have shown stable occlusion. In the past because 
of limitations of removable partial denture a more predictable 
outcome can be expected by use of over denture, especially for 
patients who already have combination syndrome or whose 
mandibular anterior teeth are structurally or periodontally 
compromised. Additional retention for mandible may be 
provided by stud attachment. Patients elapsed dental history, 
and the predicament of the remaining lower anteriors helps in the 
appraisal of an individual’s fortuity of developing combination 
syndrome.
Apportion of mechanical forces over the larger basal seat 
area along with minimal displacement over its basal seat area can 
obviate bony resorption. Commodious coverage of basal seat 
area by complete denture or removable partial denture, thereby 
prorating the forces per unit area is elemental to abate ridge 
resorption and preclude combination syndrome.
Covering 
the retromolar pad and the buccal shelf with a denture base 
retards bone loss.
The destructive changes on the soft tissues brought about 
by Class I mandibular removable partial dentures constitutes 
a strong support for “shortened dental arch” concept.
Dentures with only anterior and premolar teeth can meet oral 
functional demands in most situations.Surgical options can 
be considered in treating undesirable conditions associated 
with combination syndrome.
The fl abby hyperplastic tissue 
can be surgically removed, the papillary hyperplasia can be 
eliminated and enlarged tuberosities can be reduced, which 
allows the distal end of occlusal plane to be raised to proper 
level and allows the lower partial denture bases to be fully 
extended over the retromolar pad. Correction of premaxillary 
bone atrophy with bone grafting can be successful in treating 
combination syndrome.
Traditional occlusal schemes and posterior occlusal forms 
incorporate a vertical overlap of anterior teeth. Over time, this 
overlap results in anterior contact or hyperfunction due to the 
forward and upward movement of the mandible leading to 
bone loss caused by the anterior hyperfunction syndrome. An 
alternative option to prevent contact of anterior teeth involves 
noninterceptive linear occlusion combined with the bilateral 
fulcrum of protrusive stability. Linear occlusion consists of 
masticatory surfaces in the form of a straight, long occlusal ridge 
in contact with fl at monoplane opposing surfaces, there are no 
cusp inclines with which to make contact during the envelope 
of function. For this reason, linear occlusion is defi ned as a non 
interceptive type of occlusion requiring minimal interocclusal 
rest space.
Establishing the horizontal plane of occlusion from the 
incisal edge of the maxillary central incisors to the top of 
retromolar papilla on either side in the posterior region is an
integral part of the linear concept of occlusion.
 Guidelines for 
linear occlusion includes use of an alternative tooth form with its 
inherent absence of anterior vertical overlap. There is no need 
for the traditional 2-3 mm interocclusal rest space which does not 
mean interocclusal clearance is not needed but less is required. 
For this reason, the centric relation record was made at vertical 
dimension of rest, allowing teeth to be arranged at a vertical 
height that reduced vertical overlap of anterior teeth, 0.020 of an 
inch of vertical clearance was provided during the arrangement 
of the anterior teeth.
Both implants retained and implant supported prostheses 
have become increasing popular and have been proven 
successful in prosthetic rehabilitation of partially and completely 
edentulous maxilla and mandible.The unstable occlusion 
in combination syndrome results in progressive posterior 
mandibular atrophy. Use of a conventional denture in restoring 
the mandibular dentition provides the least patient satisfaction 
as compared with the fi xed prostheses.For this reason, the 
patient usually elects to have mandibular rehabilitation with 
implant retained prosthesis.
A fixed implant-supported prosthesis of the same design 
produced bone apposition in the posterior parts of the mandible, 
whereas an overdenture supported by two implants resulted in a 
continuous resorption of the same areas.A well-documented 
long-term results were found in fi xed mandibular prostheses 
supported by implants placed between the mental foramina and 
opposing maxillary complete dentures. A study has shown 
that in patients who received mandibular implant-supported 
fi xed prostheses bone resorption in the posterior part of the 
mandible ceased .

Comments

Archive

Contact Form

Send